Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 12:28

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
15-Year WWE Record Broken On SmackDown - WrestleTalk
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why is it called iOS 26? What happened to iOS 19 for iPhone - 9to5Mac
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What do you love doing for fun?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
When a narcissist mad at their new supply, do they take it out on the old supply?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
S&P 500 scores best May since 1990, but stocks end month with fresh tariff worries - MarketWatch
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
NASA’s Webb Rounds Out Picture of Sombrero Galaxy’s Disk - NASA Science (.gov)